Journal

Let Teachers Teach

August 31st, 2010
Frank Holleman poses with teachers from Aiken County

Frank Holleman poses with teachers from Aiken County

This is a very difficult year for teachers across South Carolina.  Because of budget cuts, their classes have grown in size, money for supplies has been cut, and many have faced furloughs.  Some of their colleagues have lost their jobs or gone into early retirement.  And with each year, the burdens on teachers have grown.

In the long run, we need to work to lower class size and to compensate and treat teachers like the essential professionals they are.

At the same time, we need to pursue policies that let teachers teach.  I often hear concerns that teachers are occupied with paperwork, clerical duties, and administrative chores.  Diverting the energies of a talented teacher to these tasks is a terrible waste of resources and of human capital.

As Superintendent, I want to examine closely all processes that come from the State Department.  There needs to be a thoughtful balance of useful data collection and consumption of resources in local classrooms and schools.  At the same time, we can also look at what happens in local districts to reduce the burdens on teachers.  This analysis must include the input and participation of public school teachers who know firsthand the challenges they face.

Education is about the liberation of the human spirit, and teachers are the people who lead students to new understandings.  We need to ensure that their energies are focused on the development of the children in their classrooms and not on chores that hurt their morale and dull their enthusiasm.

Tax Credits for Private Tuition

August 24th, 2010

A keystone of my opponent’s campaign has been his support for tax credits for private school tuition. These tax credits are really vouchers dressed up in a different outfit; political promoters of vouchers discovered that vouchers are unpopular, so vouchers were transformed to tax credits. The state Board of Economic Advisors had examined private tuition tax credit proposals before, and they would cost the state budget hundreds of millions of dollars. They would also undercut our public schools and inevitably raise taxes for other taxpayers.

These tax credit schemes are my opponent’s most prominent proposals for education in South Carolina, and perhaps the most expensive proposals by any candidate for any statewide office.

This weekend, my opponent and I debated before 300 members of local school boards from around the state, and these tax credits were a prominent topic. When pressed, he said he wasn’t sure how much the credits would cost or how large they would be. When asked how he would pay for such large sums taken out of the state budget, he said:

  • he would privatize school lunchrooms, over which the state superintendent has no control and which are funded from local budgets, not the state budget;
  • he would privatize school buses, without any proof that this approach would save money, cost money, or how much; and
  • he would require all schools in the state to be built from common blueprints, a choice now left to local school boards and funded from local bond issues, not from the state’ general fund budget.

There is no evidence that any of these proposals would save the state budget any significant amount of money or anywhere close to the substantial cost of my opponent’s tax credit proposals.

In the end, it was clear that my opponent was pursuing ideology, not sound education policy – politics and not proven public school reform. He has made a proposal without knowing exactly what he is proposing, how much it would cost, or how he would pay for it.

We need to focus on what is good for children and for academic achievement in our public schools. It is time to put aside the pointless diversions of tax credits and vouchers. In this election, let’s make clear that the good of our public schools comes before politics and ideology.

Schools as Centers of Community

August 17th, 2010
Frank Holleman in front of Little Mountain School

Frank Holleman in front of Little Mountain School

In the last two weeks, I visited two schools which embody the mission of our neighborhood public schools as centers of community.

In Little Mountain, the historic Little Mountain School is literally in the center of the community. The School District has renovated the school, and it has reopened as the Little Mountain Elementary School.  The school features hardwood floors, a  beautiful restored gym, and an impressive old-fashioned auditorium.  During the Little Mountain Reunion festival, alumni of many generations toured the building and were in awe of the renovated facility and the memories it evoked.  This school will be a special place of learning for that community’s young children and a center of the community’s life.

In Greenville, I attended the opening of the A.J. Whittenberg Elementary School of Engineering. This school is located in an inner city neighborhood. Residents of the neighborhood have first preference, and then families from around the School District (and even some from outside the district) can attend. Mr. Whittenberg, the school’s namesake and a friend of mine, was the courageous leader of the successful effort to integrate Greenville’s schools, and a wonderful portrait of Mr. Whittenberg hangs in the school.  The school’s design is striking and makes this school both a community center and an inspiring place of learning.  The school is full of energy; that spirit is promoted by its design. The school adjoins the new Kroc Center of the Salvation Army.

The designs of these two schools could not be more different. We should encourage innovation in school design, to inspire learning, cultivate community, enhance diverse local neighborhoods, and save energy and operational costs. We should not force our children to try to learn in cookie-cutter schools, or require that the same design be used on Augusta Road in Greenville, in inner city Charleston, in rural Belton, and at the coast in Beaufort.

In recent weeks, my opponent has proposed that all elementary schools in South Carolina be built according to the same blueprints, that all middle schools have a uniform design, and likewise that all high schools have the same design – as he puts it, in the same way that CVS puts the same drugstore on every lot it buys.  His proposal reflects a total lack of appreciation for the role that public schools play in our communities.

My opponent wants to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on tax credit vouchers, to bar our state from competing for $175 million for public school reform, to argue that the schools now have enough money, to stop the expansion of kindergarten for four year olds – and now, to require that all children attend schools according to a one generic design mandated from Columbia.  This is a formula for downgrading our public schools and undercutting quality education.

Running Forward or Falling Backwards?

August 11th, 2010

This week, South Carolina’s representatives were in Washington explaining why our State should win a $175 million grant in the national Race to the Top competition. In the first round, we finished 6th of all states, but only two states were awarded grants. In the second round, we ran past 21 states and are one of 19 finalists. If we receive the grant, South Carolina will be in the forefront of public education reform in America.

Unfortunately, my opponent is against South Carolina even competing for this $175 million grant. Our competitors in Georgia, North Carolina, and Florida are trying to win the grant, and Tennessee won in the first round. They would like nothing better than for South Carolina to have a Superintendent who would not even go on the field. His position would be a blow to our state’s reputation and its standing in the constant competition for economic development.

Our application was supported by all our school districts, and supportive letters were provided by our state’s colleges and universities, both United States Senators, the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce, and other candidates for Superintendent of both parties.

My opponent’s definition of education reform is handing out hundreds of millions of dollars of tax credit vouchers, which are unaccountable and unaffordable. Instead, we need to be working to help our teachers improve their professional skills, to develop principal leadership, to give our educators the tools they need to improve academic achievement for all students, and to involve parents and instill responsibility in our students.  We need to look for ways to innovate and to transform our schools.  And, in a time of limited resources, we have to be aggressive in seeking grants wherever we can find them.

South Carolina should Race to the Top. We should not be a backwater of public education reform, bypassed by neighboring states and stuck with a Superintendent whose ideology prevents him from pursuing opportunities for our state and its students.

The Future of Young Children is At Risk

July 13th, 2010

Yesterday, the Associated Press reported that my November opponent “opposes any expansion in the state’s limited 4-year-old kindergarten program, likening it to daycare.”

Except perhaps for his support of expensive tax credit vouchers, this may be my opponent’s most disturbing position. Decades of research have proven that high quality early childhood education makes a tremendous difference in educational and life outcomes for children, particularly those at risk. Talented professionals work with young children to improve their social skills and their readiness to learn to read and to do math. Disabilities can be detected early and addressed.

High quality early childhood education may be our most effective tool to close the achievement gap and to increase high school graduation rates.  Noted economists have determined that investments in high quality early childhood initiatives yield great financial returns to the community as a whole — reducing costs in special education, social services, and law enforcement while increasing tax payments by successful high school graduates, college graduates, and employees.

Leaders from all political persuasions support high quality early childhood education.  The United Way, Success by Six, the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce, university researchers, local foundations, and many others across South Carolina have been working for years to expand the opportunities for young children, particularly those at risk.

The last thing we need is a Superintendent of Education who does not understand the basics of early childhood research and who opposes one of our most effective education strategies.

Career and Technical Education

July 5th, 2010

The last week of June, career and technical educators from across South Carolina gathered in Greenville to exchange ideas, to meet with business and industry leaders, and to learn about the most effective approaches to preparing students for a very competitive world economy.  I was the only candidate for S.C. Superintendent in attendance.

If South Carolina and its students are going to succeed in the coming decades, we must have vigorous, rigorous, and supported career and technical education opportunities for all students.

Last Friday’s New York Times has a front-page article that summarizes the issue, in one field – manufacturing:  “[Manufacturers] are looking to hire people who can operate sophisticated computerized machinery, follow complex blueprints and demonstrate higher math proficiency than was previously required of the typical assembly line worker.”  The same is true of health care, the service sector, and most other parts of our economy.

We need to be clear:  career and technical education is not about tracking students to a watered-down curriculum or about weakening standards.  In fact, the opposite is true.  We know that most jobs in the future will require some higher education, and most will require sophisticated knowledge and skills.  The leaders in career and technical education presented scholarships last week to some of their leading students, and all were going on to four-year colleges and universities.

Other students will attend our excellent two-year technical and community colleges, and others will go directly to the workplace.  All need a strong high school experience that prepares them to move on with life and hit the ground running.   More need to take AP and dual credit courses in high school, and more need to obtain certifications that will give them a head start when they graduate.

Career and technical education can build our economy, improve our graduation rate, and engage our students.  We need to move forward with implementation of the Education and Economic Development Act and to connect our high schools more closely with our universities, our two-year colleges, and business and industry.  If we succeed, our economy and our communities will be stronger for it.

Making a Difference this Summer

June 28th, 2010

Frank Holleman visits the Communities in Schools summer program at Lakeview Middle School in Greenville County.

Last week, I visited a Communities in Schools summer program at Lakeview Middle School for students on the west side of Greenville County.  Research demonstrates that students, particularly those with academic challenges, fall behind during the summer break.  This program is designed to keep the students academically engaged, while also teaching them about good nutrition and a healthy lifestyle.

During a time of budget cuts, this program exists because of support from the national 21st Century Learning Communities initiative.  This program was started by Dick Riley’s Education Department when we worked together at the U.S. Department of Education.   One of our colleagues, Terry Peterson, led the design of the program, and it has thrived ever since.

This effort underscores what we must do in a time of scarce resources.  The program is funded by a national grant and administered by a local nonprofit, which is supported by the United Way and private donors and led by a volunteer board.  The program takes place in a public school, and the instructors are public school teachers.  Local, state, and national funds are combined to achieve great results for students.

My opponent in November, Mick Zais, is publicly opposing South Carolina’s effort to win a $175 million national Race to the Top grant, a grant that could benefit students and teachers and put South Carolina in the front ranks of education reform.  We can’t let misguided ideology blind us to the need to seek the resources we need wherever we can find them and to work together with the community to improve public education for all children.

Political Spectacle

June 21st, 2010

Of all the regrettable political spectacles in South Carolina recently, perhaps the worst was the sorry sight of South Carolinians having to fight to overturn vetoes that threatened a variety of education initiatives. Among other efforts, the vetoes were aimed at arts education, community public libraries, and SC ETV. The arts, libraries, and ETV build our communities, our economy, and our culture. They are essential to the quality education of our children and of all adults.

You would expect that our State’s leadership would be building these institutions, not threatening to tear them down. Unfortunately, citizens around the state had to divert their energies from their local community work to the politics of overriding vetoes. Fortunately, in some instances they were successful.

There is a segment of South Carolina’s political class that seeks to attack these important parts of our local schools and communities for political advantage. For example, when I last wrote about arts education, the campaign manager for one of my potential opponents, Mick Zais, broadcast what he thought was a political zinger: “What is a higher priority: art appreciation or reading?”

This is exactly the kind of politics we need to knock down. The arts, libraries, and ETV promote reading and a high quality education. In fact, they are part and parcel of both. Just as South Carolina rejected some of these vetoes, let’s work to reject this kind of politics, too.

More Diplomas

June 1st, 2010

Today, I attended a celebration lunch with students who participate in Graduate Greenville and who are graduating from high school this year.  Graduate Greenville is a partnership of the United Way, the Alliance for Quality Education, and the School District; I am Chair of the effort.  We recruit citizen volunteers who visit the homes of drop outs to encourage them to return to school, we sponsor summer enrichment programs for rising 9th graders at risk of dropping out, and we raise funds to hire graduation coaches who work with students who otherwise may not graduate.  Similar programs exist now in Florence and Anderson.

If you had been at this luncheon, you would have learned some of the keys to solving South Carolina’s graduation rate challenge.  One student had decided not to return to school his senior year; one of our volunteers convinced him to return, and our graduation coach helped motivate him to finish.  For some of the students, they have little support at home, and the graduation coach provides the guidance, encouragement, and direction the student needs.  A number of the students are graduating in less than four years; some had failed one or more years before Graduate Greenville came into their lives.

One is going to attend a 4-year college, others are going to Greenville Tech, and others are entering the workforce or the military.  All these students have proven to themselves that they can succeed, and they have taken an important step toward personal success by obtaining a high school diploma.

This was an emotional gathering, as the students described their challenges and the role that the graduation coaches had played in their lives.  I have no doubt that most or all of these students would not have graduated but for Graduate Greenville.  Ideally, early childhood education and interventions in elementary and middle school ensure that students will succeed in high school and graduate.  There will always be students, though, who need help during their teen years to set and achieve their educational goals.

We are making a difference and turning around young lives.  Similar successes are taking place across South Carolina.  We need to make sure that more of them happen.  Our future – and the lives of young people – are at stake.

Graduation

May 25th, 2010
The Holleman Family at Anna Hollemans Graduation

The Holleman Family at Anna Holleman's Graduation

High school graduation season is coming up.  Anne and I will be attending the graduation of our youngest child, Anna, who will receive her diploma from Greenville High School.  This year, we will also be celebrating the graduation of some other high school students.

I am Chair of Graduate Greenville, a community partnership formed to improve the high school graduation rate.  The United Way, the Alliance for Quality Education, and the School District joined hands to help some of our most challenged students graduate.  We sponsor a summer enrichment session for rising 9th graders who are struggling, hire graduation coaches, and organize citizen volunteers who visit drop outs in their homes and convince them to return to school.  Similar initiatives have begun in Anderson and Florence.

This year, some of the Graduate Greenville students will be receiving diplomas.  In fact, some students will graduate early:  one failed a year and has caught up, one has a child and wants to graduate and enter the workforce, and several have attended high school and twilight school to earn more credits.  Others are graduating on time, including a homeless student now proceeding to Greenville Tech, a student who failed last year in another state but will graduate here this year, one student who has been in 3 high schools in 4 years, and one student who had decided to drop out but was convinced to return by our volunteers.

Many people talk about South Carolina’s high school graduation rate, but we should pay more attention to those who are doing something about it.  Projects like this one across South Carolina have resulted in the finding by Diplomas Count that South Carolina’s graduation rate is improving faster than those of all the other states.  But this effort will require hard work by the community, the schools, and students.  Many of these students face significant challenges and economic struggles.

If we disregard some of the loudest critics and instead join with those who are making a difference, we will have something to celebrate every graduation season.